Patrick Foster, Media Correspondent
Over 900 restaurants nationwide. Find your nearest now
The BBC is to allow less swearing on its television channels next year, the corporation’s head of television said yesterday.
The decision follows the row over the obscene phone calls made by Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand to the 78-year-old actor Andrew Sachs, as well as growing unease with Ross’s language on his Friday night BBC One show.
Jana Bennett, director of BBC Vision, said that the corporation did not want to alienate its viewers and had taken the decision to “push back” the number of expletives.
In its final report on the obscene calls row last week, the BBC Trust, the corporation’s internal watchdog, criticised Ross’s BBC One chat show. In one programme, in May, he told the actress Gwyneth Paltrow that he “would f*** her”, which the trust said was “gratuitous and unnecessarily offensive”.
Mrs Bennett, to whom the controller of each BBC television channel reports, told the Manchester Media Festival that the presenter had agreed to reduce swearing in his television show after that incident.
She said: “There was a mutual thing to push back on the language. We didn’t want to get into a situation where we were pushing away part of the audience of the show.”
She said that she had to approve personally every use of the C-word on BBC television, adding: “That was one of the surprising aspects of the job when I got it.” F*** and motherf*****”, which are considered the next most offensive words, were referred to channel controllers to clear.
Mrs Bennett said that anybody who tried to count swearwords on the BBC would see that they had become less frequent even since the early autumn.
“We’ve actually been pushing back a bit on language,” she said. “It is possible that some language alienates some audiences unnecessarily. There will be less F-ing but the blinding seems to be OK.”
Mrs Bennett said that there would be greater discussion about the appropriateness of swearing on the BBC, and pointed to the example of a documentary following soldiers in Afghanistan. That was more likely to justify inclusion of profanities that might offend in different contexts, she said.
She added: “There’s higher sensitivity about making sure there’s more discussion about slots, type of channel and genre. I think the idea that you can alienate audiences is – even if people don’t ring up – we don’t want people to be put off, even if they’re silent.” Ross and Brand’s prerecorded calls to Sachs, on Brand’s Radio 2 show, generated more than 40,000 complaints to the broadcaster.
Dave Barber, the station’s head of compliance, and Lesley Douglas, Controller of Radio 2, both resigned. A subsequent investigation into the incident showed that Douglas had authorised the programme’s broadcast with a single e-mail, containing only the word “yes”.
The BBC Trust described the calls and their broadcast as a “deplorable intrusion” and an “unacceptable breach of privacy”. Brand resigned, but Ross escaped the sack and is suspended without pay until late January.
The moment your toes touch the sand and your gaze meets water, you know you’re in the Bahamas
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2005 / 55
£59,500
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £60,000
The Army Benevolent Fund
London
£28k+ Basic + Commission
Drummond Selection
London
12-15 days a year, c £12K
Springboard
London
£Competitive
American Airlines
Heathrow, London
Great Investment, River Views
One and Two Bed Apartments
Wandsworth Town
Times Online Property Search will help you Find It
like nothing on Earth!
.
Must end 28 Feb 2009!
Save up to 25%
Amazing Far East Offers
Visit Malaysia from £755pp
Great travel insurance deals online
.
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Using sexual swear words is far too rife by a huge number of people, especially those in the public eye. What has swearing to do with cooking for instance. Perhaps a bit more self control & respect would help reduce the number of mothers f-ing & blinding at their kids in the street & vice versa
Peter, Hailsham, England
Personally I find the BBC to be relatively light on the obscenties; in fact I've heard more in an hour's tutorial at university than in an hour of Silent Witness. If their obscenties are too much for people, they can turn of their TV's, and while they're at it, refuse to hold a normal conversation.
Rachael, Oxford, UK
Could they also make the news, news again, and not a rip off of Entertainment news?
mgb, Dumfries, Scotland
Well how charming of the BBC to "cut back" on crude offensive langauge. When will they wake up and realise that only a zero tolerance of profanities will restore their reputation and endear them most decent people
rob, London, UK
About time. However, your opening line suggests they have NOT ALLOWED innoffensive language in the past. In other words, are you saying they have actively encouraged swearing?
Ron, Milton Keynes, UK
Why do we always have to satisfy the lowest common denominator.
I dont mind swearing on telly.
Phil , aberdeen,
keep the swearing but get rid of the socialist bias
alastair harris, DERBY,
Could they also crack down on the too loud background music as well. Even documentaries have music when the presenter is speaking. You have to fight to hear what they are saying. The radio is just as bad. Music is fine - but not when people are speaking.
Veronica, Manchester,