Sarah-Kate Templeton
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
A cancer patient who was sent home to die by hospital doctors but then discovered a cocktail of drugs that stabilised his illness has now been told that the NHS will not pay for his medicine.
Jack Hose, 71, a retired engineer, was receiving a chemotherapy drug called irinotecan on the NHS, but it was failing to halt his bowel cancer.
NHS doctors told Hose, from Bournemouth, that they could do no more for him and that he should go home and make the most of the rest of his life while taking painkillers.
Hose was not prepared to die and sought a second opinion from a private doctor who recommended trying another drug, called cetuximab, in combination with irinotecan.
The mix of drugs appears to have stabilised Hose’s cancer. However, cetuximab is not funded by the NHS.
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, which is treating Hose, has told him that, if he takes the drug, he will need to pay for all his care, including the cost of the medicine he initially received on the NHS.
Hose is the latest victim of the government’s policy of denying NHS treatment to patients who pay for an additional private drug.
Alan Johnson, the health secretary, says such an arrangement, known as “co-payments”, would lead to a two-tiered NHS.
“It seems outrageous that, having paid National Insurance contributions for 50 years, they are now asking me to pay for my care,” said Hose.

Read other articles in the Sunday Times campaign to highlight the plight of cancer patients denied NHS care if they pay privately for a top up medicine:
Doctors for Reform fight NHS order to halt cancer care
Fighting cancer and the ‘unjust’ health service
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
How is the word "obscene" spelled? Hint. It has 3 letters.
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California
James Burgess - you miss the point. The issue is not that cetuximab is not funded by the NHS but that this gentleman is being forced to pay for his entire treatment due to being in a position to pay for the extra drug. Equality stands for nothing when the result is unnecessary, or early death.
Stuart, Southampton, UK
Graham, St Albans - your criticism of the healthcare professionals is unjustified. Blame the government who encourage/enforce this sort of positive discrimination, not just in the health service but across society. The GPs, et al, may be highly paid, but they do the best with the resources they have
Stuart, Southampton, UK
Article 26th May, NHS went on £1bn spending Spree to avoid surplus in financial year. - this is outrageous when cancer patients are being denied drugs to help them cope with serious disease. My neice is age 40 from Enfield and has been denied drugs by her health authority, two appeals failed.
Caroline, Reading,
His mistake is not being one of Gordon Brown's constitutents.
If you're Scottish you get this drug for free whether you've earned it or not.
The Scottish Raj look after their own.
Gareth Young, Lewes, England
Tax payers fund the NHS but it's budget is consumed by mainly salary. GP salaries up 50% in a few years, consultant salaries up 22% in one year. Highest paid docs in Europe but we can't get decent medication! The service is run for the benefit our medical elite. Worst service in Europe, well done!
Graham, St. Albans, uk
Hose's mistake is to be a retired engineer instead of a politician. Given the expenses claimed by Ann Keen and her MP husband, it's no surprise the NHS don't fund cetuximab.
Diana, Derby, uk
The sad truth is about the United Kingdom, is that it no longer generates wealth necessary to support its weakest citizens; the government has borrowed all it can borrow and can not raise any more money in taxes.
The strong economy, that Gordon Brown inherited is plainly no longer strong.
peter c, devizes, wessex
You ask how we can refuse treatment - it's because although the drug may have beneficial effects, the benefits for every pound it costs are insufficient compared to spending the same amount of money on other treatments. There is is a line in the sand of 'cost-effectiveness' of about £30,000 per year
James Burgess, Crickhowell, Wales, UK
If the NHS can't pay for cetuximab, that's their problem,
not Mr Hose's. Co-payment isn't 'fair' - ridiculous. Getting cancer isn't fair and people who try to help themselves should not be penalised. It's Mr Hose's money and if he wants to spend it on additional drugs he should be free to do so.
Sarah, Carcassonne, France
Why are neither the Lib Dems nor the Tories tearing Johnson and Brown apart over this? Couldn't be that they're all the same could it?
Eddie Reader, birmingham, england
I think under EU rules if he does not get the treatment he needs he can always go to France and get the treatment there and the bill will be sent to the UK hospital authority.
How can we simply refuse to treat someone who has more than paid for this with his contributions.
joe, Edinburgh, Scotland