Jane Macartney in Beijing
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
A few months ago Abdulghappar Turkistani wrote from his cell in Guantanamo Bay of his yearning to see the sun and feel the air.
Now a US federal judge has ruled that Turkistani, and 16 other Chinese Muslims held prisoner for seven years, must be set free and released into the United States from the naval facility in Cuba.
The decision drew delight from other Uighurs, from north-western China’s Xinjiang region, now living in the United States, swift condemnation from the administration and anger from China which regards them as members of a terrorist organisation bent on separatism.
In a stern rebuke of the US government, District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina said it would be wrong to continue holding the detainees since they no longer are considered enemy combatants. The must be released by Friday, he ruled.
He said: “I think the moment has arrived for the court to shine the light of constitutionality on the reasons for the detention.” His words drew cheers and applause from local Uighur residents in Washington and from human rights activists packed into the US District courtroom.
The 17 Uighurs were officially declared no longer "enemy combatants" by the government earlier this year, but officials had maintained they could continue to hold the men at Guantanamo Bay if no other country accepted them. Only Albania has agreed to take the Uighurs, welcoming a group of five who were flown there from Guantanamo Bayin 2006 and who now live in refugee accommodation with no possibility of returning to their families any time soon.
The men had been left in limbo because of the dilemma of where they would go after their release.
China has urged the United States to repatriate the "terrorist suspects," but Washington has resisted, suspecting they could be tortured and jailed upon their return. For years the United States has attempted to persuade other countries to resettle the group, recognising that the Turkic-speaking minority has been widely persecuted by Chinese authorities
That left Turkistani and his fellow Uighurs in prison even after being told as long ago as 2004 that they would be released because they had been ruled to pose no threat. In a letter released by his New York-based lawyers earlier this year, Turkistani said the 17 were held in cramped, windowless cells for up to 22 hours every day.
He said: "We fail to know why we are still in jail here. Being forbidden from the natural sunlight, natural air, being surrounded with a metal box all around is not suitable for a human being"
Most of the Uighurs were picked up by bounty hunters in Pakistan and Afghanistan shortly after the fall of the Taliban and handed over to the US military. They are believed to have fled China to seek a new life overseas and some were even en route to the United States.
It was the first time a court had ordered that "war on terror" prisoners detained at the US base should be released onto US soil, and the government of President George W. Bush swiftly said it planned to appeal the decision.
"The district court's ruling, if allowed to stand, could be used as precedent for other detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, including sworn enemies of the United States suspected of planning the attacks of 9/11, who may also seek release into our country," a spokeswoman said in a statement.
However, Rebia Kadeer, president of the World Uighur Congress, called the decision a victory for oppressed Uighur in China. The former high-profile Chinese businesswoman now living in exile after serving several years in a Xinjiang jail, said: “This is our destiny. This is our people's win. This concerns our freedom. China accuses us of being terrorists, but we are not.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
It is typical that the US which has held them without trial for so many years is worried about their human rights. When will people see the hypocrisy?
David Whitney, Blackpool, UK
Please have them in London, make petition to Brown that you wnat them in UK.
sengqi, Beijing,
"If China wants them, China will get them. I doubt the USA can stop them now".
Chris, rochdale, UK
Does this justify giving the lambs to the wolf?
Those victims must be accepted to live in the West.
Antonio da Silva, Rosario, argentina
So they were kept in prison in inhumane conditions because they would have been tortured and imprisoned?
All a bit catch-22 really.
edward, walsall, england
What right does a judge have to circumvent US immagration law? While I feel for some of these people; I do not want them here. Federal Judges seem to be immune from everything, including any sense of responciblity for their actions.
A. Adams, Biloxi,
During the Olympics, much was made of China's lack of human rights. Here's an opportunity to put your money where your mouth is. So the US or the UK should grant them political asylum. After all, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Dave, Perth, Australia
If they are released I hope it is into this judge's neighborhood.
Jerry, seattle, usa
If China wants them, China will get them. I doubt the USA can stop them now.
Chris, rochdale, UK